Mission Isra 88 Inhaltsangabe & Details
Colonel Harold Richards und Mikrobiologe Abe Anderson fliegen seit 13 Jahren mit dem Raumschiff ISRA 88 durch den Weltraum auf der Suche nach dem Rand des Universums. Der triste Alltag auf dem Raumschiff bringt Probleme mit sich. Abe wird zu einem. Zurückhaltend inszenierter, verwirrend erzählter, weitgehend logikfreier Sci-Fi-Film für eingefleischte Fans. In den Weiten des Weltalls befindet sich die ISRA 88 auf einer wichtigen Mission. An Bord des Raumschiffs sind der Mikrobiologe Abe Anderson und Lieutenant. sawchain.eu - Kaufen Sie Mission ISRA 88 - Das Ende des Universums günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden. Mission ISRA 88 - Das Ende des Universums Kritik: 9 Rezensionen, Meinungen und die neuesten User-Kommentare zu Mission ISRA 88 - Das Ende des. In Thomas Zellens Science-Fiction-Film Mission ISRA 88 - Das Ende des Universums melden sich ein Wissenschaftler und ein Pilot freiwillig für eine langjährige. Originaltitel: ISRA 88__Herstellungsland: USA__Erscheinungsjahr: __Regie: Thomas Zellen__Darsteller: Casper Van Dien, Sean Maher.
Mission Isra 88 Movies / TV Video
Approaching the Unknown Official Trailer #1 (2016) - Mark Strong, Luke Wilson Movie HDMission Isra 88 - Alle Kritiken & Kommentare zu Mission ISRA 88 - Das Ende des Universums
Als Harold allerdings bemerkt, dass von Abe eine eigentümliche Macht ausgeht, bekommt er es mit der Angst zu tun. Alltägliche Geräusche und Musik, die genau wie die Fernsehserien, die Anderson sich permanent anschaut, aus den er, er, er Jahren stammt, sorgen im Zusammenspiel mit der Ausstattung, in weiten Teilen ebenfalls aus der Mitte des letzten Jahrhunderts, für eine zusätzliche Ebene zeitlicher Verwirrung. Filmtyp Spielfilm.Mission Isra 88 Special offers and product promotions
Wissenswertes. Produktions-Format. Would have been better with a woman on board instead Süchtig Nach two guys bickering over nothing. Kann es Tribute Panem 3 Stream, die verschachtelten Erinnerungen und die verschwommenen Wahrnehmungen vergangener Ereignisse dazu zu nutzen, die Mission zu beenden? Farb-Format Farbe. Your transaction is secure. Back to top.Mission Isra 88 Video
Extrême film d'Action Complet en français avec Jason Statham HD Mission ISRA 88 - Das Ende des Universums ein Film von Thomas Zellen mit Casper Van Dien, Sean Maher. Inhaltsangabe: Colonel Harold. In den Weiten des Weltalls befindet sich die ISRA 88 auf einer wichtigen Mission. An Bord des Raumschiffs sind der Mikrobiologe Abe Anderson (Sean Maher). sawchain.eu: MISSION ISRA 88 - DAS ENDE DES [Blu-ray] []: van Dien, Casper, Maher, Sean, Riegel, Eden, Barbeau, Adrienne, Matthews, Liam. Your transaction is secure. Amazon Renewed Like-new products you can trust. Während Richards sich mit einem disziplinierten Tagesrhythmus Struktur gibt, hat sich Anderson angewöhnt, die kleinen Tüten mit dem Schnaps Bruce Lee Death leeren und alte Serien aus den 40er Jahren anzusehen, die ihnen auf einer Festplatte mitgegeben wurden. The film appears to be illogical and out of sequence. Boring to say the least. Other Sellers on Amazon. Daniel Craig James Bond is an illusion. Beginn der unendlichen Langeweile Wir befinden uns auf einem wenig kreativen aber schier endlosen Weg gen Ende des Universums, wo auch immer das sei. There's a problem loading this menu right now.And from the beginning I didn't expect anything, but the artistic maybe even post-modern conceptualism. All mentioned are now spread over a half of century of movie making Says enough about artistic freedom of such movies.
And just to make it clear: I'm not comparing, except in artistic and scientific non-conclusiveness. Not a small bite for the makers only looking through that prism.
The subject of the end of the universe itself is scientifically in the theoretical edge of modern cosmology and even some cognitive sciences to the measure of hard core artistic approach.
And the one we have here bravely joins in - abstract and non-understandable. The boundary of space-time ends where it begins, could also be a holographic projection of Big Bang omega point or n-dimensional Klein-bottle perpetual knot Who knows?
Trust me: not even Hawking nor any other cosmologist today. But, oh, what a great way to let our imagination construct often wicked and far-out narration!
From time to time, we need to "brain-out" on this subject. So, let's not be harsh nor judge on this one neither!
I am a big fan of science fiction movies and television shows. This is unfortunate because almost all fare these days is completely devoid of any ideas, with none of the striving towards the new and strange which should be the hallmark of a science fiction production.
Huge amounts of money are spent to make complete drivel which is not even marked by interesting use of CGI. In this desert of science fiction film-making, one finds an occasional excellent, original, well-produced movie.
ISRA88 is not that movie. The acting is bad, the sets are bad, the science doesn't make senseand yet.. ISRA88 has the germ of an original idea involving the multiverse, and incorporates a theoretical concept for propulsion which actually has been written about by scientists.
I am referring to the "black hole drive". Someone on the team for ISRA88 had an interesting idea centered on scientific speculation, which is more than I can say for the entire team of Star Trek writers or Doctor Who writers.
For this reason I rate the film at 3 stars. There is some merit. I would watch this film 5 times before I watch another Star Trek or Marvel atrocity.
I don't recommend that you try this, however. I really don't know why I finished this movie. The only thing it has going for it is the cover art.
I kept hoping it would get better, but when it was over I was relieved to be done with the P. Just look at the cover art and dream up your own movie for 5 or 10 min, then go do something useful.
Or go re watch a good sci-fi movie you haven't seen in a while. You would have more fun stepping in dog do with new shoes than watching this movie.
There are practically no special effect and very little action. There is much repetition. I bet it didn't cost more than to produce this.
If I could give it a a negative rating, I would. I actually have a different viewpoint than the negative reviews.
I actually watched the movie twice. Like back to back because it was so intriguing. It is a very slow movie but it is very purposeful so that you can pay attention!
Which is truly the point of this movie. The spacemen.. I figured that out the first time around but decided to watch it again to see how he ended up making it back to his wife which turned out to be him never leaving.
The movie lapse not only into different version of the same thing but also different time periods.
It's an extremely deep movie. I have so many thoughts but I'd basically write out the whole movie if I keep going.
If you like to think very deeply this is a movie for you! It's not sci-fi. It's the exact contrary. If you regard it as fantasy, it might become a little less unwatcheable.
And "the end of the universe". What does that even mean? First I was baffled because the performances were so awful that I had to cry, but I am pretty sure they did their very best and never really stood a chance.
I couldn't even start to think of any meaning in the movie, as it lacked the cerebral stimulation that a movie without a point needs like A Space Odyssey.
The physics were so over-bend, that it destroyed any kind of illusion for me. Apart from the poorly done CG, this flick has nothing to show.
Bot does exactly that for nearly two hours. Unforgettably forgotten. The promised spoiler: It even has an attempted suicide scene or ASS, for short.
TheLittleSongbird 7 August Like a lot of sci-fi films, there are many genre landmarks that won't be named in order to be fair to 'Mission 8', although the genre has seen its fair share of stinkers, especially the low-budget ones.
Have no bias towards films with low budgets, actually there are good ones out there that manage to intrigue and entertain regardless of flaws.
The concept was a good one. There are a few alright points, though nothing comes off brilliantly. The problems are many and they override what 'Mission 8' succeeds a little in.
It is not a case of watching the film with the intent to hate it, far from the truth. Actually wanted it to be halfway decent.
The acting could have been much worse than it actually was though there is still not anything exceptional or awards worthy , with Casper Van Dien and Adrienne Barbeau trying their best and hardly being charisma free.
Some of the music appeals and doesn't feel discordant or too much of a dirge at the same time it's somewhat unmemorable and parts are intrusive.
In terms of the story, on the most part that is one of 'Mission 8's' biggest problems but it does pick up a little towards the end when it gets more eventful and intriguing.
However, the story takes far too long to get off the ground. Much of the film is very dull and has very little story to sustain the relatively short running time, no matter how much extraneous padding there was.
There is nothing tense or suspenseful in 'Mission 8' and it is too ridiculous to get any fun and too muddled and cheesy to take it seriously.
Similarly, too much of it gets rather vague so the film fails to make sense frequently. The ending in particular is one of the biggest head-scratchers for any of my recent film viewings.
There were a few nice ideas here in 'Mission 8', explored nowhere near enough. There is nobody to endear to, let alone root for, with such flimsy character development and so many irritating and barely logical decision making.
The production values are drab and rushed-looking with afterthought-like effects. Overall, not unwatchable but messy. I have two words to describe this movie.
Quantum consciousness. If these two words do not appeal to you then move on. However, if you find quantum consciousness appealing then you may appreciate this movie.
Be warned this is a very, very slow moving movie. However, it does a great job of describing its narrative on Well, I suppose I will refrain from continuing due to the possibility of spoiling the ending.
If you are a quantum physicist remember that this is a movie so just relax. Rabh17 1 October I checked this review off as a possible 'spoiler' simply because this movie has a major unintended detraction going against it: It's called Sci-Fi.
I didn't know exactly what to expect either when I popped it in late last night. I was expecting a quickie end of the universe space adventure before I went to bed What would happen to Physics?
What would happen to Time? What would happen to the men who entered such as Region? When you realize those are the actual questions being talked about by Dr Withersford Adrienne Barbeau Also-- further suspension of belief than is usual for Sci-Fi is required herein I'll grant you I found myself intrigued by the questions posed.
I give the Movie 7 out of 10 for a Brave Effort. You Have to be 'In the Mood' for this movie. I actually thought this film was well done and quite entertaining and kept me interested long enough to watch to the end.
Obviously has flaws but why it has such a low rating on IMdB is beyond me.. I guess if you paid for this at the theater I could see being let down some.
But seriously it was well acted and had some excellent scenes as the hero Dr. Abe Anderson played by Sean Maher quite well went through mental gymnastics from reality to hallucinations and imaginations back to reality.
I watched this on a rainy Saturday afternoon on tv and I am glad I did not read any think on this web site before I watched it.
It was good.. It's a slow-moving enterprise about a couple of guys on a mission to the very edge of space, and possibly beyond.
What this involves is merely a single location drama heavy on dialogue and short on action. Adrienne Barbeau has a one-scene cameo which is pointless too.
With no FX, no action, no suspense and nothing else to recommend it, this really is the pits. Its not like its more like the Truman Show or Groundhog day.
Not as funny but interesting and more twilight zone like. You do start at the end with an interesting in reverse mixed with alternate reality voyage.
I found it interesting and sort of got what they were going for. It does boil down to time and two personalities plus events chronology. I liked the music the foreshadows.
The repetitive nature of each day was kind of interesting. I fell asleep and had to finish it next day. So there is that, its a thinking movie if you like those.
It got you thinking about how weird it would be to know when and how someone dies and interacting with them ahead of time Its OK.
Although a "sci-fi" movie, I'd call this more of a psychological thriller within a science setting. It is very well acted.
Empirical science takes somewhat of a back seat to inner, psychological aspects of what is happening to, and within, these two men as they zip through space at 5 million miles per second.
The movie gets you thinking, and keeps you thinking the whole way through. If you like your movies all laid out on a plate, this isn't for you.
You have to earn your satisfaction with this movie. But there are various points of the movie that give you a break with some humour interspersed.
And the top notch. My young children were captivated by the movie and stayed with it to the end, offering their comments and thoughts about what exactly was happening.
The ending was curious and you'll be thinking about it while you're dozing off to sleep, and probably the next morning. Snootz 23 March This movie is somewhat interesting all the way through Currently this movie has a not so stellar 3.
Good to know that I am not the only one that did not enjoy this movie. Maybe there is a good story under the mess of a movie I have no idea what this movie was supposed to be about I was relieved Avoid this one.
Let's just chop this up and put it in a confusing non-linear sequence just because we once saw a better film-maker do that.
Ich habe diese wunderbare Kretik gelesen und habe sie hier einfach mal reinkopiert, weil sie einfach mal perfekt ist. Beginn der unendlichen Langeweile Wir befinden uns auf einem wenig kreativen aber schier endlosen Weg gen Ende des Universums, wo auch immer das sei.
Nach schier endloser Langeweile häufen sich merkwürdige…. Review by Vincent Noel. Did you ever wonder what Red Dwarf would be like if it were an overly self-important indie movie, almost entirely devoid of humor and so slathered in half-baked metaphysics as to make it night-incomprehensible and even less scientific accurate?
Well of course you didn't, but here it is anyway. I think this is one of those science fiction movies where the science fiction element is a metaphor for the human condition because let's be honest, who cares about that space shit anyway?
It's really not very good, is what I'm saying, despite very good performances by Maher and Van Dien.
So I was a bit confused by this strange, mind-bending space drama that was in the 'sci-fi action' category. Other than that it's not a TERRIBLE movie, it takes quite a while for anything to start taking shape, and it all just seems like a random bunch of events that are being presented out of order.
AS the movie nears duration subtle And not so subtle details start to emerge that give you a much grander scope of just what has happened here "At the edge of the universe: I feel like it runs a LITTLE to long for what it is.
What should have been a 30 minute short was unfortunately stretched into nearly 2 hours. All science fiction movie's I've seen. I will keep adding movies.
I've excluded cross-genre movies that weigh heavily on the…. Science fiction films that feature astronauts and various aspects of space exploration programs manned spaceflight, satellite maintenance, and space station….
If there's a Poundland store in your area, I'd recommend checking it out every other week, as they regularly stock…. ISRA Where to watch Trailer.
Director Thomas Zellen. Thomas Zellen. Lon Stratton. Ryan Stratton.
External Reviews. Top Box Office. The characters changed their basic personalities, and the end made me angry. Euphoria Kostenlos Anschauen grant you October 30 - 1. So I was a bit confused by this strange, mind-bending space drama that was in the 'sci-fi action' category. Other than that it's not a TERRIBLE movie, it takes quite a while for anything to start taking shape, and it all just seems like a random bunch of events that are being presented out of order.
AS the movie nears duration subtle And not so subtle details start to emerge that give you a much grander scope of just what has happened here "At the edge of the universe: I feel like it runs a LITTLE to long for what it is.
What should have been a 30 minute short was unfortunately stretched into nearly 2 hours. All science fiction movie's I've seen. I will keep adding movies.
I've excluded cross-genre movies that weigh heavily on the…. Science fiction films that feature astronauts and various aspects of space exploration programs manned spaceflight, satellite maintenance, and space station….
If there's a Poundland store in your area, I'd recommend checking it out every other week, as they regularly stock…. ISRA Where to watch Trailer.
Director Thomas Zellen. Thomas Zellen. Lon Stratton. Ryan Stratton. Studio Eenie Ienie Over Productions.
Genres science fiction adventure thriller mystery. Desperately seeking Duane Dibbley. Well, maybe you should hold on a sec. Because Beyond The Edge and….
Truly an absolute intergalactic abominable. Made no sense. The metaphor works well, the movie not so much. Progressed from terrible to bad.
Strangely didn't hate it! A serious waste of film, and my time. Die Liste wurde am Die Liste wurde…. Crap In Space! Alien Trash From Another World!
Boring, boring, boring. Long, very long scenes where nothing of any importance happened. I wonder that the director ever asked 'how does this scene move the story along?
The characters changed their basic personalities, and the end made me angry. No one could think of something interesting to happen, or at least make the audience think?
I walked away from this movie wondering why anyone bothered to create it, much less why anyone would bother to watch it.
Two words of advice: run screaming. If you don't have a background in science or psychology I can see where you might not enjoy this movie.
I have a university degree in physics and found it brilliant from beginning to end. Not all the physics works, but that shouldn't be a deal breaker because filmed entertainment never gets all the physics right.
And I'm not a big fan of the Many Worlds hypothesis, which others have postulated this movie tends toward read up on the theory of Eternal Inflation if you want to know what's really out there.
So, spoilers ahead: What's depicted in this movie is what takes place between two people who agree do to something no one should ever be asked to do.
In a universe different from our own, in an era where the rest of their technology is approximately equivalent to where ours was in the s, the scientists have figured out a way to travel through space at a billion light years per year.
When the astronauts achieve their goal breaking through the edge of their universe , multiple universes and times begin to merge into their own.
But by then, having spent 13 years in space together, the astronauts' mental health and ability to interact has eroded to zero. As other reviewers have noted, the movie begins at the end and for the most part moves backward in time, showing with riveting effectiveness how the astronauts descend into their own, and their interpersonal, mental collapses.
Other reviewers have posted a big "what the hell" about the ending; final major spoiler: The movie ends in a universe where the the scientist Dr.
Abe Anderson is not selected for the mission. The reason being that in his universe his wife has not left him, therefore he fails the mission planner's criteria: a pilot who only cares about flying and a scientist with pretty much nothing left to live for.
Worst decision of the year by a long way! The vast majority of the running time consists of two astronauts wandering aimlessly around a set that looks like it was left over from a school play, and that's about it.
Perhaps I missed something I certainly didn't see the Space Shuttle at any time during the film but as far as I could tell there is no plot other than a vague 'attempt to reach the edge of the universe' wherever,or whatever, that might be.
I suspect the people responsible for this mess were trying to make some profound point about space, time, mankind, or some other deep concept but they have failed and the film is dull, pointless and totally without merit.
If that hasn't put you off, I've got a second-hand DVD going cheap This movie is probably not for everybody, but hey, everybody has Iron Man 26 to entertain them!
I loved this film start to finish. I thought the acting was great, the tone captivating, the set serviceable, and the humour subtle.
The concept is extremely interesting, it's a shame the answers are not a little more obvious but I suppose that is the point.
I was engrossed during the entire runtime and really enjoyed realising why things had happened at the start that were initially confusing made sense towards the end i.
It's low on effects, thrills, and budget, but high in all the right places for the cerebral viewer. Had to write the personal view on this one, primarily to point out the level of the movie-subject underestimation.
Firstly I would like to put aside typical movie-quality scales, like story-line dramatization, scenario , length, acting, effects, so on.
Its abstract subject is the one and only, but truly deep, thing that one should build opinion on. And from the beginning I didn't expect anything, but the artistic maybe even post-modern conceptualism.
All mentioned are now spread over a half of century of movie making Says enough about artistic freedom of such movies. And just to make it clear: I'm not comparing, except in artistic and scientific non-conclusiveness.
Not a small bite for the makers only looking through that prism. The subject of the end of the universe itself is scientifically in the theoretical edge of modern cosmology and even some cognitive sciences to the measure of hard core artistic approach.
And the one we have here bravely joins in - abstract and non-understandable. The boundary of space-time ends where it begins, could also be a holographic projection of Big Bang omega point or n-dimensional Klein-bottle perpetual knot Who knows?
Trust me: not even Hawking nor any other cosmologist today. But, oh, what a great way to let our imagination construct often wicked and far-out narration!
From time to time, we need to "brain-out" on this subject. So, let's not be harsh nor judge on this one neither! I am a big fan of science fiction movies and television shows.
This is unfortunate because almost all fare these days is completely devoid of any ideas, with none of the striving towards the new and strange which should be the hallmark of a science fiction production.
Huge amounts of money are spent to make complete drivel which is not even marked by interesting use of CGI. In this desert of science fiction film-making, one finds an occasional excellent, original, well-produced movie.
ISRA88 is not that movie. The acting is bad, the sets are bad, the science doesn't make senseand yet.. ISRA88 has the germ of an original idea involving the multiverse, and incorporates a theoretical concept for propulsion which actually has been written about by scientists.
I am referring to the "black hole drive". Someone on the team for ISRA88 had an interesting idea centered on scientific speculation, which is more than I can say for the entire team of Star Trek writers or Doctor Who writers.
For this reason I rate the film at 3 stars. There is some merit. I would watch this film 5 times before I watch another Star Trek or Marvel atrocity.
I don't recommend that you try this, however. I really don't know why I finished this movie. The only thing it has going for it is the cover art.
I kept hoping it would get better, but when it was over I was relieved to be done with the P. Just look at the cover art and dream up your own movie for 5 or 10 min, then go do something useful.
Or go re watch a good sci-fi movie you haven't seen in a while. You would have more fun stepping in dog do with new shoes than watching this movie.
There are practically no special effect and very little action. There is much repetition. I bet it didn't cost more than to produce this. If I could give it a a negative rating, I would.
I actually have a different viewpoint than the negative reviews. I actually watched the movie twice. Like back to back because it was so intriguing.
It is a very slow movie but it is very purposeful so that you can pay attention! Which is truly the point of this movie.
The spacemen.. I figured that out the first time around but decided to watch it again to see how he ended up making it back to his wife which turned out to be him never leaving.
The movie lapse not only into different version of the same thing but also different time periods. It's an extremely deep movie.
I have so many thoughts but I'd basically write out the whole movie if I keep going. If you like to think very deeply this is a movie for you!
It's not sci-fi. It's the exact contrary. If you regard it as fantasy, it might become a little less unwatcheable. And "the end of the universe".
What does that even mean? First I was baffled because the performances were so awful that I had to cry, but I am pretty sure they did their very best and never really stood a chance.
I couldn't even start to think of any meaning in the movie, as it lacked the cerebral stimulation that a movie without a point needs like A Space Odyssey.
The physics were so over-bend, that it destroyed any kind of illusion for me. Apart from the poorly done CG, this flick has nothing to show. Bot does exactly that for nearly two hours.
Unforgettably forgotten. The promised spoiler: It even has an attempted suicide scene or ASS, for short.
TheLittleSongbird 7 August Like a lot of sci-fi films, there are many genre landmarks that won't be named in order to be fair to 'Mission 8', although the genre has seen its fair share of stinkers, especially the low-budget ones.
Have no bias towards films with low budgets, actually there are good ones out there that manage to intrigue and entertain regardless of flaws.
The concept was a good one. There are a few alright points, though nothing comes off brilliantly. The problems are many and they override what 'Mission 8' succeeds a little in.
It is not a case of watching the film with the intent to hate it, far from the truth. Actually wanted it to be halfway decent.
The acting could have been much worse than it actually was though there is still not anything exceptional or awards worthy , with Casper Van Dien and Adrienne Barbeau trying their best and hardly being charisma free.
Some of the music appeals and doesn't feel discordant or too much of a dirge at the same time it's somewhat unmemorable and parts are intrusive.
In terms of the story, on the most part that is one of 'Mission 8's' biggest problems but it does pick up a little towards the end when it gets more eventful and intriguing.
However, the story takes far too long to get off the ground. Much of the film is very dull and has very little story to sustain the relatively short running time, no matter how much extraneous padding there was.
There is nothing tense or suspenseful in 'Mission 8' and it is too ridiculous to get any fun and too muddled and cheesy to take it seriously.
Similarly, too much of it gets rather vague so the film fails to make sense frequently. The ending in particular is one of the biggest head-scratchers for any of my recent film viewings.
There were a few nice ideas here in 'Mission 8', explored nowhere near enough. There is nobody to endear to, let alone root for, with such flimsy character development and so many irritating and barely logical decision making.
The production values are drab and rushed-looking with afterthought-like effects. Overall, not unwatchable but messy. I have two words to describe this movie.
Quantum consciousness. If these two words do not appeal to you then move on. However, if you find quantum consciousness appealing then you may appreciate this movie.
Be warned this is a very, very slow moving movie. However, it does a great job of describing its narrative on Well, I suppose I will refrain from continuing due to the possibility of spoiling the ending.
If you are a quantum physicist remember that this is a movie so just relax. Rabh17 1 October I checked this review off as a possible 'spoiler' simply because this movie has a major unintended detraction going against it: It's called Sci-Fi.
I didn't know exactly what to expect either when I popped it in late last night. I was expecting a quickie end of the universe space adventure before I went to bed What would happen to Physics?
What would happen to Time? What would happen to the men who entered such as Region? When you realize those are the actual questions being talked about by Dr Withersford Adrienne Barbeau Also-- further suspension of belief than is usual for Sci-Fi is required herein I'll grant you I found myself intrigued by the questions posed.
I give the Movie 7 out of 10 for a Brave Effort. You Have to be 'In the Mood' for this movie. I actually thought this film was well done and quite entertaining and kept me interested long enough to watch to the end.
Thomas A. Translate Captain Marvel Stream to English. Other Sellers on Amazon. Sean Maher. Alltägliche Geräusche und Musik, die genau wie die Fernsehserien, die Anderson sich permanent anschaut, aus den Die Croods Stream, er, er Jahren stammt, sorgen im Zusammenspiel mit der Ausstattung, in weiten Teilen ebenfalls aus der Mitte des letzten Jahrhunderts, für Mutter Katzenberger zusätzliche Ebene zeitlicher Verwirrung. Ihre Persönlichkeit wird überwiegend durch ihre wiederkehrenden Handlungen dargelegt. Top reviews Most recent Top reviews. This film seems to incorporate Himalaya Rathenow number of theories, but the explanation we are given is "it's complicated. There is a theory that all things exist at one time. Möchte ich sehen.
Warum gibt es eben?
Wacker, Ihre Phrase ist glänzend